External Drive - APFS or HFS+
Comments
-
You should do a Google search on the subject. There's lots of opinions. I know that if you have a Time Machine backup do not convert it. Because APFS lacks hard link support, converting an HFS+ volume to APFS destroys those links and replaces them with broken soft-link aliases. The files will still be there but the links will be broken.
I just ordered a new Mini. I know i don't a choice with the new mini ssd. But have some of the same questions with my multiple connected USB drives and a new raid that i just ordered. Link From Apple: https://support.apple.com/en-gb/HT208018 -
I would stick with HFS+ journaled on your external hard drives. It is a stable, proven file system that works reliably. The internal SSD and external hard drives do NOT need to have same file system. I maintain nearly 90 TB of external media on my server. HFS+ works.
APFS has some (dubious) advantages on an SSD, but not for hard drive storage of media. When I copy a video file, I want an actual duplication performed, not just a link to a pseudo-instance of the data. Sure it's much faster to pretend to make a copy, but that doesn't create actual data redundancy.
Under SS usage scenario, APFS delivers no benefit on your external hard drives. -
Thanks.
-
Yes. Thanks that seems to be the the consensus.
-
Hi, it’s a few years later now and I wanted to see if you still agreed that the external drive where the recordings are being saved to should be formatted as HFS+ journaled instead of APFS. I just bought a new Sandisk Extreme Pro 2TB SSD and want to make sure I format it properly. Thanks
-
Thanks for checking @rpmartinez - in the last couple of years we have seen some problems with HFS+ format disks on newer macOS versions and Mac hardware. Therefore, on new systems, we now recommend using APFS for all disks.
-
Great to hear, thank you!
